Insight

Insight from Agora Consultants

Does forecast status make sense?

  Within the project management industry we often see people include “forecast status” as an element of project status reports along with current status and previous status. The expectation is Project Managers will include a status of what they think the status will be for the next reporting period. For instance, the Project Manager would forecast if finances will be red, yellow or green. Status is defined as “state or condition of affairs”. It is a measurement of where things are right now. Previous status makes sense. Previous status is the condition of affairs measured at a previous point in time. Forecast status does not make sense. It is not possible to measure something in the future. The intent of forecast status is “what do you think the condition of affairs will be at the next reporting period”. In order to make this forecast, a project manager will (should) base it on something measured today. By reporting that measurement as the indicator of predicted status, it is a truer representation of the information. Instead of trying to measure into the future, measure something today that is a predictor of future status. Some people refer to this as a leading indicator. For instance, if it is financial status, the number of pending change requests may be an indicator that the finance status may change. Moving towards metrics that are based on current information rather than an opinion of the future eventually results in better decision making since the information is more accurate.

How to get high-value information cheap

Have you ever been in the situation where you needed to know something about a population and don’t have the budget to measure it for everyone? By sampling a population and applying an Excel function you can obtain an approximation for the overall population. This concept is best illustrated through an example. Consider that you are responsible for product marketing at an amusement park. You need to know the proportion of boys that attend vs. females that attend so that you know how many blue vs pink sunglasses to stock. (I am using colour as a simple proxy for “sunglasses that boys like” vs. “sunglasses that girls like” – we won’t get into discussing colour and gender). You discover that the customer service folks conducted a customer satisfaction survey that included collecting gender information. We can use this sample information to draw conclusions for the entire population. The magic is through using the Binomial distribution. I won’t get into the math details her but for those so inclined details of this distribution is on wikipedia. Utilizing the distribution you can calculate confidence intervals based on a confidence level. The more samples you use the tighter the confidence interval. The great thing is it doesn’t matter if the overall population is 2000 or 200,000, provided you do random sampling the confidence interval results are the same. If we observe that 30% of the people who responded on the survey are male and we want a 90% confidence level, the following table shows the confidence interval based on the number of samples we take. Number of samples Low confidence interval High confidence interval 100 23% 38% 300 26% 34% 500 27% 33% 1000 28% 32% For example, if we have 300 samples we can be 90% sure that between 26% and 34% of the entire population is male (regardless of the sample size). Microsoft Excel provides the CRITBINOM function to help calculate these values. Note that to use this method you need to ensure that you are doing a random sampling. This means that the samples need to happen across different factors that might influence the results. In the amusement park example, if you did all the surveys just as the local girls school arrived for their annual trip you certainly wouldn’t be able to apply the results to the entire population. When conducting measurements within your organization sampling is a cost-effective, statistically relevant way of getting information you need when you don’t require the exact value.